share
Print this page

Press Release: NETWORK Marks Fiftieth Anniversary of President Johnson’s War on Poverty

FOR RELEASE: January 8, 2014                                                                           

CONTACT: Stephanie Niedringhaus, 202-347-9797 x224,  sniedringhaus@networklobby.org

Washington DC: NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby, today issued the following statement:

Exactly 50 years ago today, President Lyndon Johnson announced that his administration was declaring a War on Poverty. As he said that day, “The richest nation on earth can afford to win [this war]. We cannot afford to lose it.” He was right.

Some would have us believe that his plan failed, but they are wrong. In fact, our nation’s poverty rate fell from 26% in 1967 to 16% in 2012 when we factor in support provided by safety-net programs. Many of those programs, which include SNAP (food stamps), Medicaid, Medicare and expanded Social Security, grew out of his goals.

Today, a large number of politicians who claim the War on Poverty failed are actively attacking safety-net programs that have been so effective. That is appalling, and we at NETWORK will continue to lobby Congress to protect and strengthen the safety net.

To lower poverty rates still further, however, we need more than just safety-net programs.  We must also address structural problems in our economy that continue to exacerbate income and wealth disparities, leaving far too many still in poverty while  the wealth of those at the top soars. Solutions to these problems include fair tax and housing policies, access for all to asset building, and just wages.

Our faith calls for justice and compassion within our communities and nation. As Pope Francis wrote, “The need to resolve the structural causes of poverty cannot be delayed, not only for the pragmatic reason of its urgency for the good order of society, but because society needs to be cured of a sickness which is weakening and frustrating it, and which can only lead to new crises. Welfare projects, which meet certain urgent needs, should be considered merely temporary responses. As long as the problems of the poor are not radically resolved by rejecting